Fundamental Approaches to Auditory
Sensory Aid
The auditory-oral
approach is based on the fundamental premise that acquiring competence in
spoken language, both receptively and expressively, is a realistic goal for
children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Further, this ability is best
developed in an environment in which spoken communication is used exclusively.
This environment includes both the home and the classroom. Elements of the auditory-oral
approach that are critical to its success include:
- Parent involvement
- Appropriate amplification
- Consistent quality speech training
- Developmentally appropriate language instruction
- Range of placement option.
PROS
The primary benefit is
being able to communicate directly with a wide variety of individuals. This
ability brings with it options in terms of education, vocation, and social
life. Statics reported that 88% of the 100 16- and 17-year-olds they studied
had proficiency with spoken language and had high levels of speech
intelligibility. The average reading ability of these students was at 13- to
14-year-old levels, which is approximately double the national average for all
children who are deaf.
CONS
As with every approach
to educating children who are deaf or hard of hearing, not all children will be
successful. Unanswered questions remain about auditory functioning (even some
hearing children cannot use their hearing well), language processing (some
children may also have additional language disorders), and learning styles
(some learning styles inhibit the attention and vigilance needed to develop
orally). As research provides more information, the small number of children
who cannot benefit from auditory-oral education will diminish. Fortunately, the
availability of effective amplification removes severity of hearing loss as a
limitation of auditory-oral education.
Aids for Persons with Auditory
Impairments
Hearing aids can be
analog or digital. Older analog hearing aids can be programmed with settings
for various listening environments according to the user's preferences. Digital
hearing aids, usually more expensive than analog, can be fine-tuned for
specific frequencies and have more programming flexibility.
- Behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids
A plastic case that
hooks behind the ear houses the electronics. It's attached to a customized,
plastic ear mold that fits in the outer ear.
Pros:
Good for mild to profound hearing loss, allows
for the most amplification among all types, long battery life, easy to clean
Cons:
May be visible, can be difficult to wear with
eyeglasses
- Open-fit behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids
The miniature digital
component fits completely behind the ear, eliminating the need for a mold. A
small tube runs into the ear canal.
Pros:
Voices sound less "plugged up," less
visible than other hearing aids, the tube's design keeps it away from earwax --
good for people who have wax buildup -- and allows the ear canal to remain open
Cons:
Smaller batteries don't last as long as larger
ones, small size may limit ability to make manual adjustments, may be visible,
not good for severe to profound hearing loss
- In-the-ear (ITE) hearing aids
A small, custom-molded plastic case sits in and completely fills
the outer ear and has no external wires or tubes.
Pros:
Good for mild to severe hearing loss, optional
"telecoil" makes it easier to hear phone conversations and some
public sound systems, has volume control
Cons:
Is visible in the ear, may be sensitive to
wind noise, not good for severe to profound hearing loss
- In-the-canal (ITC) hearing aid
A tiny case, custom
molded to fit the size and shape of the ear canal, sits partly in the ear
canal.
Pros:
Good for mild to
moderately severe hearing loss, less visible than other hearing aids, usually
works well with the telephone, less sensitive to wind noise
Cons:
Not good for severe to
profound hearing loss, small size may make it difficult to adjust and remove,
may cause some feedback
- Completely in-the-canal (CIC ) hearing aid
A tiny case is nearly
hidden deep in the ear canal. Usually has a cord or tiny handle to aid in
removing it.
Pros:
Good for mild to moderately severe hearing
loss, less visible than other hearing aids, usually works well with the
telephone, less sensitive to wind noise
Cons:
Not good for severe to profound hearing loss,
small size may make it difficult to adjust and remove, no volume control, too
small to hold devices like telecoil, smaller batteries don't last as long as
larger ones, can become clogged with wax and require repairs.
No comments:
Post a Comment